When moving the ending spoils the piece
A reverse outline can tempt you to put every answer first. Try this counterexample.
At seven on Sunday, Mina laid four plates on the table. She lived alone.
At eight, she put three of them away. She left the one with the chipped rim.
At nine her brother knocked. “You kept mine,” he said.
Before reading on: What question does the first paragraph open? What changes at eight? Which exact words finally tell you why the chipped plate matters?
Compare your reading
“She lived alone” makes the four plates strange. Clearing three raises a narrower question: why keep that particular one? “You kept mine” gives the chip a history without explaining the siblings’ past. Moving the last line to the opening would make the action easier to explain and less interesting to follow.
Try cutting “She lived alone.” The four plates now have ordinary explanations: family dinner, guests, habit. The reader may first sense something unusual a paragraph later. That is a change of pace, not automatically an improvement.
Both versions leave the other two places unexplained. A reader who experiences that as loss may want the silence. A reader who experiences it as an abandoned clue may need another detail. Choose the effect you mean to create.
Return to the worksheet guide